CLIMATE RISKS
Two elements
GFIA strengthens cooperation with international bodies and expresses strong positions on supervisory approaches to climate risk and sustainability reporting
Building on a fruitful end to 2021, especially the webinar that was broadcast during the November 2021 COP26 UN climate conference, the Climate Risks Working Group continues to hold exchanges with international stakeholders on climate-related issues. Its aim is to bring to their attention the positions, actions, commitments and concerns of the global insurance industry, as well as to foster dialogue at international level.
GFIA compiled information about various natural disaster insurance schemes across the world to better understand the differences between them and to inform the debate on enhancing climate resilience. The charts, published in the context of GFIA’s engagement at COP26, provide information on a number of markets, including data on coverage and market penetration for selected natural catastrophe risks for both individual and commercial insurance lines.
Soon after the COP26 activities, in December 2021, the Working Group invited the Cambridge Institute for Sustainability Leadership, an interdisciplinary institute that develops solutions for a sustainable economy at the University of Cambridge, for a conversation about its report, “Risk Sharing in the Climate Emergency: Financial regulation for a resilient, net zero, just transition”, which called on policymakers, financial and climate authorities and financial sector players to take action to support the transition. In terms of the insurance sector, it called for insurers to become pioneers of climate-related disclosures, prudential supervision and climate stewardship.
And the Working Group started 2022 through engagement with the newly established Climate Risk Steering Group of the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS). It contributed to the IAIS’s work on climate-related scenario analyses by sharing the expectations that the global insurance sector has of insurance supervisors. The Working Group also shared inputs on potential data elements to be added to the Global Monitoring Exercise, which is the IAIS framework for monitoring potential systemic risk in the global insurance sector.
Given the OECD’s work on sustainability-related issues, GFIA organised a meeting with its Climate Adaptation Finance and Investment Program in April 2022. This was a great opportunity for the Working Group to learn more about the OECD framework on climate-resilient finance and investment and about its forthcoming work on climate adaptation.
On the occasion of COP27 in November 2022, GFIA published a statement calling for collective action to prevent loss of life and reduce economic losses from future natural disasters. The statement reiterated (re)insurers’ determination to put their experience, commitment and assets at the service of the ecological transition, to help close the protection gap and to help build a more resilient society.
GFIA’s COP26 webinar: “The global insurance industry — a key partner in creating more sustainable and resilient societies”
“There is no practical evidence that insurers are exposed to systemic risks from climate change.”
No systemic risk from climate change
In June 2022, GFIA submitted comments to the Financial Stability Board’s consultation on supervisory and regulatory approaches to climate-related risks. GFIA welcomed the intent of the Financial Stability Board’s Interim Report, which is to provide guidance to cross-sectoral supervisors in order to avoid standards in different jurisdictions that are duplicative or contradictory and to facilitate the assessment of material climate-related risks, which is still at an early stage of development.
GFIA highlighted that there is no practical evidence that would justify concluding that insurers are exposed to systemic risks from climate change. Since the effects of climate change materialise over time, insurers are able to adjust their policies, underwriting, pricing and decisions on whether to cover a risk.
Support for global baseline for sustainability reporting
Throughout the year, several jurisdictions worldwide have individually stepped up their efforts on sustainability reporting. The IFRS Foundation Trustees launched an International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB) during COP26 and aimed to accelerate the convergence of global sustainability reporting standards focusing on enterprise value.
GFIA’s Climate Risks Working Group thus seized the opportunity to build a strong common position on this issue. It supports the ISSB’s objective of creating a global baseline for sustainability reporting on which individual jurisdictions can build, when necessary, through a “building blocks” approach. It is essential that this global baseline is developed through cooperation with relevant jurisdictions. GFIA also provided recommendations to the ISSB that will strengthen the design of the disclosure requirements in order to create a consistent framework that will provide manageable, intelligible and comparable sustainability information.
Awareness-raising campaigns
Insurers across Europe are involved in a broad range of awareness-raising campaigns. For instance, in Germany, risk-awareness campaigns are implemented jointly by state authorities, consumer protection organisations, the insurance industry, architects and other stakeholders. Their collaboration is built around a common goal: to raise awareness of the effects of climate change and natural hazards, of the benefits of loss prevention, and of best practices as regards natural catastrophe-resilient buildings. The high level of risk awareness in Germany is one of the reasons for the relatively low protection gap; indeed, the insurance penetration rate for natural perils such as storm or hail is more than 90%.
Most European insurance associations have initiatives to raise risk awareness, such as dedicated workshops, events and educational seminars, as well as frequent in-depth articles, themed newsletters, presentations and other publications.
Many French insurers have launched prevention campaigns and also support the campaigns of “Assurance Prévention”, an association founded by the French insurance association (France Assureurs). Assurance Prévention has produced numerous leaflets, infographics, quizzes, etc. to raise awareness of natural risks. Through its initiatives, it aims to develop a “culture of risk prevention” among students and teachers.
Education
The European insurance industry works to increase financial literacy in relation to risk awareness, insurance protection and long-term savings:
The Croatian Insurance Bureau (HUO) launched a first educational project in 2009, “Financial literacy in the Republic of Croatia”, which was followed by a range of educational activities, often implemented jointly with independent insurers. One of these activities, “Safer Tomorrow”, was initiated in 2021, and aims to raise citizens’ awareness of the benefits of insurance. Within the framework of the project, HUO launched several videos and infographics, some of which specifically target young people.
The HUO organises a yearly competition for the best scientific paper, the best graduate thesis and the best undergraduate thesis in the field of insurance. HUO also publishes the “Croatian magazine for INSURANCE”, a scientific journal for professionals to advance good practice in the sector. Finally, some insurers in Croatia created a colouring book for children to promote financial literacy at a young age in a fun and simple way.
In Italy, the ANIA Academy, together with CeTIF (Research Centre on Technologies, Innovation and Finance of the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), launched the second edition (2022) of the 2nd level master’s in insurance management to train professionals and enable them to respond to the challenges of the “new normal”.
ANIA is also collaborating with LUISS Business School to develop a major course in insurance management as part of its Executive Master in Financial Management.
Insurance Europe produces information for consumers as part of its “InsureWisely” financial education initiative. This includes one-pagers on different insurance topics, including how to limit the effects of natural catastrophes.
The French insurance association (France Assureurs) developed a series of educational booklets within the framework of EDUCFI (the French national strategy for economic, budgetary, and financial education), an initiative launched by the French Central Bank. These booklets help users to better understand how insurance works and what insurance products do and do not cover.
The Spanish insurance association (UNESPA) set up a financial education programme for schools, “El Riesgo y Yo” (“The Risk and I”). It involves 40 insurance undertakings and 164 volunteers and aims to give 2 500 teenage school students basic financial knowledge and insights into risk management.
Tools and solutions for consumers
Several insurers have developed tools or applications to inform consumers of extreme weather events and whether their properties are at risk from such events.
In 2021, the German insurance association (GDV) introduced a new system for making the risk to buildings of heavy rain damage more transparent. Buildings are placed into one of three risk categories, depending on their location.
The German insurance sector has also developed the “Naturgefahrencheck” (Natural hazards check) and “Hochwassercheck” (Flood check) online tools. With one click, every citizen can check the degree to which their home is at risk of flood, hail and storms. It is quick and easy to understand, it provides the information by postal code area free of charge and it does not require registration.
Swedish insurers developed VisAdapt, a tool designed to help homeowners to decrease the risk of weather-related events affecting their houses.
The Austrian association of insurers (VVO) and the Austrian government jointly developed the HORA app/website (Natural Hazard Overview and Risk Assessment Austria), which helps to determine whether there is an impending risk of flooding or other natural hazards. The website also presents up-to-date weather data on floods, including on water levels, as well as earthquakes, storms, hail, lightning and snow.
French insurers participate in the National Observatory for Natural Risks, a project involving three major partners: the Ministry of Ecological Transition, the CCR (Caisse Centrale de Réassurance) and the MRN (Mission Risques Naturels), an association created by the French insurance association (France Assureurs). This initiative aims to boost prevention and contribute to increased awareness of the risk of natural disasters by keeping citizens informed of their exposure to potential natural hazards.
The Salvage Foundation was established as an independent foundation in 1986 at the initiative of Dutch fire insurers, which are all members of the Dutch insurance association (VVN). The Salvage Foundation is unique in Europe and provides aid after fire, water, lightning, explosion or storm damage. Salvage arrives on site within an hour, undertakes damage mitigation activities, arranges shelter and provides the insurance company with the information it needs to carry out the claim settlement process without delay.
Tools and solutions for insurers
Some associations have developed tools to help insurers assess the risks and consequences of natural hazards.
In Germany, ZÜRS Geo (Zonierungssystem für Überschwemmungsrisiko und Einschätzung von Umweltrisiken) is an online zoning tool that allows insurers to calculate accurately different types of flood risk and offer risk-related premiums.
ANIA Safe, a subsidiary of Italian insurance association ANIA, created GeoSafe, a platform that uses AI-based calculations and models to help insurance companies evaluate the risks and consequences of natural hazards and disasters, such as floods, earthquakes and crop damage.
The French insurance association (France Assureurs) created a dedicated technical body, Mission Risques Naturels (MRN) and MRN GIS (General Information System), to assist private insurers in analysing their customers’ and prospective customers’ exposure to different natural hazards. MRN GIS also gives insurers access to public authorities’ hazard-zoning data, and data on land-use planning restrictions by risk level.
The French CERES tool (accessible to insurers via the CCR website) helps private insurers to benchmark their geolocalised loss records against those of the market.
In Spain, UNESPA published a report to help insurers navigate the recommendations and opinions issued by supervisors and international organisations on the procedures for insurers to integrate sustainability risks and factors into the different areas of their governance.
Forecasting and early warnings
The Dutch insurance association (VVN) publishes an annual Climate Impact Monitor (Klimaat Impact Monitor) in collaboration with Wageningen University & Research (WUR). The Climate Impact Monitor provides a compilation of extreme weather data and loss data, and other climate-related data. The VVN collaborates with the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) on issuing early warnings of extreme weather events. Combining data from the KNMI with risk and loss data from Dutch insurers allows for greater preparedness in the face of changing weather patterns, and the development of solutions to prevent damage from future extreme weather events.
UK insurers carry out a range of activities to support national and regional forecasting of future weather and catastrophe patterns. They use these outputs to inform their business practices, including pricing decisions and risk-based capital assessments. The UK insurance sector also uses such modelling in its dialogue with policymakers and has lobbied for robust action on climate change by the government.
Floods
The Czech insurance association (ČAP) and Intermap Technologies, with the support of reinsurer Swiss Re, created flood maps that are used to assess the likelihood of floods occurring in the Czech Republic. ČAP members use the system to evaluate risks and calculate property insurance premiums. It is also a useful free tool for consumers, as it helps them to determine whether their property is situated in a flood zone and it provides them with important information about insurance options, indicating for instance where there would be a possible premium increase. (Commercial and company use requires a contract with Intermap Technologies). The map data is updated regularly to ensure consistency with the information used by ČAP members.
The German insurance sector has also developed the “Naturgefahrencheck” (Natural hazards check) und “Hochwassercheck” (Flood check) online tools. With one click, every citizen can check the degree to which their home is at risk of flood, hail and storms. It is quick and easy to understand, it provides the information by postal code area free of charge and it does not require registration.
Swedish insurers developed VisAdapt, a tool designed to help homeowners to decrease the risk of weather-related events affecting their houses.
The Austrian association of insurers (VVO) and the Austrian government jointly developed the HORA app/website (Natural Hazard Overview and Risk Assessment Austria), which helps to determine whether there is an impending risk of flooding or other natural hazards. The website also presents up-to-date weather data on floods, including on water levels, as well as earthquakes, storms, hail, lightning and snow.
In Germany, ZÜRS Geo (Zonierungssystem für Überschwemmungsrisiko und Einschätzung von Umweltrisiken) is an online zoning tool that allows insurers to calculate accurately different types of flood risk and offer risk-related premiums.
What are the ICS and AM?
The IAIS is seeking to create a common supervisory language for group solvency and to enhance the global convergence of group capital standards with the ultimate goal of introducing a global Insurance Capital Standard (ICS) for international groups. Since the beginning of 2020, a version of the ICS (ICS 2.0) is being monitored for a five-year period.
By the end of that five-year monitoring period, the IAIS also aims to have assessed whether the Aggregation Method (AM), which has been developed by the US and other interested jurisdictions, provides comparable outcomes to the ICS and can be considered an outcome-equivalent approach to ICS implementation.