TAXATION
On your marks
Get ready for implementation of the global minimum corporate tax rules
By Suzy Zozor, chair of the GFIA Taxation Working Group
As we reflect on the GFIA Taxation Working Group’s work over the last year, more than 50 jurisdictions are reported to be set on drafting regulations to implement Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) rules (see explainers box) in their domestic tax legislation. What seemed an unachievable goal in the early days of the BEPS Action 1 works in 2015 is now taking shape, both swiftly and slowly depending on the viewpoint.
The OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS, see explainers box) issued in December 2022 a draft GloBE Information Return and the outlines of ongoing discussions on tax certainty, safe harbours and penalty relief. The Inclusive Framework sought input from stakeholders and GFIA contributed by highlighting the need for simplifications and the adverse effect of designing a strenuous reporting requirement while seeking swift global implementation.
Given the complexity of the GloBE rules, as pointed out by many stakeholders including GFIA and GFIA member associations, the Inclusive Framework issued in February 2023 Administrative Guidance intended to provide further clarifications. While GFIA acknowledged the Inclusive Framework’s extensive work and the consideration given to comments the industry had submitted in previous papers, GFIA felt it necessary to underscore where the additional guidance needed further fine-tuning.
As the implementation process is moving forward in many jurisdictions — and at a rather brisk pace in the EU and the UK — the Inclusive Framework continues to release additional material for clarification purposes on the implementation framework. An updated version of the GloBE Information Return, additional guidance and the outlines of the subject to tax (STTR, see explainers box) rule were released in late July 2023.
After thorough analysis of the GloBE rules package as it is being refined by the Inclusive Framework, most tax authorities are now considering the inclusion of a qualified domestic minimum top-up tax (QDMTT, see explainers box) in their domestic implementation package. Not only does such a QDMTT, if truly qualified, exempt multinational enterprises from full computation as set out in the GloBE Rules in the given jurisdiction, but it also enables the implementing state to collect tax from resident ultimate parent entities (UPEs, see explainers box).
The idea was to provide financial resources to states by fighting a tax race to the bottom. Well, lesson learned; there may very well be a 15% QDMTT in most implementing countries.
Pillar One slowly emerges
The OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS agreed in October 2021 on a two-pillar solution to address global tax issues stemming from the digitalisation of the economy. Intended to reallocate part of the tax base in the jurisdiction where goods and services are consumed, Pillar One is designed for a phased implementation. According to its design and if all implementation conditions are met, as of 2025 Pillar One will provide for the reallocation of excess profits made by multinational enterprises that exceed the threshold of US€20bn turnover and 10% profitability. That threshold is set to be lowered pursuant to a peer-review.
The OECD released a progress report in November 2022 and various consultation documents in January and July 2023, thus shaping a clearer picture of the rules to come. GFIA welcomes the fact that insurance and reinsurance are now fully included in the Regulated Financial Services Exclusion, as the multinational enterprises in the industry are usually taxed where they operate.
“GFIA welcomes the fact that insurance and reinsurance are now fully included in the Regulated Financial Services Exclusion.”
Pillar One, Pillar Two … and the rest
GFIA’s Taxation Working Group has also covered issues other than the gigantic two-pillar OECD tax reform, such as the review of VAT rules in various jurisdictions that would have spill-over effects on insurance, the outcome of the peer review at OECD level on the Common Reporting Standard and the entry into force of International Financial Reporting Standard (IFRS) 17 on insurance contracts.
The draft public country-by-country reporting (CbCR) legislation in Australia also kept the Taxation Working Group busy, monitoring the parliamentary process of enactment as the first draft diverged completely from other existing public CbCR rules. GFIA thus highlighted what difficulties such differences in the local reporting requirement could entail for multinational enterprises operating in Australia.
Awareness-raising campaigns
Insurers across Europe are involved in a broad range of awareness-raising campaigns. For instance, in Germany, risk-awareness campaigns are implemented jointly by state authorities, consumer protection organisations, the insurance industry, architects and other stakeholders. Their collaboration is built around a common goal: to raise awareness of the effects of climate change and natural hazards, of the benefits of loss prevention, and of best practices as regards natural catastrophe-resilient buildings. The high level of risk awareness in Germany is one of the reasons for the relatively low protection gap; indeed, the insurance penetration rate for natural perils such as storm or hail is more than 90%.
Most European insurance associations have initiatives to raise risk awareness, such as dedicated workshops, events and educational seminars, as well as frequent in-depth articles, themed newsletters, presentations and other publications.
Many French insurers have launched prevention campaigns and also support the campaigns of “Assurance Prévention”, an association founded by the French insurance association (France Assureurs). Assurance Prévention has produced numerous leaflets, infographics, quizzes, etc. to raise awareness of natural risks. Through its initiatives, it aims to develop a “culture of risk prevention” among students and teachers.
Education
The European insurance industry works to increase financial literacy in relation to risk awareness, insurance protection and long-term savings:
The Croatian Insurance Bureau (HUO) launched a first educational project in 2009, “Financial literacy in the Republic of Croatia”, which was followed by a range of educational activities, often implemented jointly with independent insurers. One of these activities, “Safer Tomorrow”, was initiated in 2021, and aims to raise citizens’ awareness of the benefits of insurance. Within the framework of the project, HUO launched several videos and infographics, some of which specifically target young people.
The HUO organises a yearly competition for the best scientific paper, the best graduate thesis and the best undergraduate thesis in the field of insurance. HUO also publishes the “Croatian magazine for INSURANCE”, a scientific journal for professionals to advance good practice in the sector. Finally, some insurers in Croatia created a colouring book for children to promote financial literacy at a young age in a fun and simple way.
In Italy, the ANIA Academy, together with CeTIF (Research Centre on Technologies, Innovation and Finance of the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), launched the second edition (2022) of the 2nd level master’s in insurance management to train professionals and enable them to respond to the challenges of the “new normal”.
ANIA is also collaborating with LUISS Business School to develop a major course in insurance management as part of its Executive Master in Financial Management.
Insurance Europe produces information for consumers as part of its “InsureWisely” financial education initiative. This includes one-pagers on different insurance topics, including how to limit the effects of natural catastrophes.
The French insurance association (France Assureurs) developed a series of educational booklets within the framework of EDUCFI (the French national strategy for economic, budgetary, and financial education), an initiative launched by the French Central Bank. These booklets help users to better understand how insurance works and what insurance products do and do not cover.
The Spanish insurance association (UNESPA) set up a financial education programme for schools, “El Riesgo y Yo” (“The Risk and I”). It involves 40 insurance undertakings and 164 volunteers and aims to give 2 500 teenage school students basic financial knowledge and insights into risk management.
Tools and solutions for consumers
Several insurers have developed tools or applications to inform consumers of extreme weather events and whether their properties are at risk from such events.
In 2021, the German insurance association (GDV) introduced a new system for making the risk to buildings of heavy rain damage more transparent. Buildings are placed into one of three risk categories, depending on their location.
The German insurance sector has also developed the “Naturgefahrencheck” (Natural hazards check) and “Hochwassercheck” (Flood check) online tools. With one click, every citizen can check the degree to which their home is at risk of flood, hail and storms. It is quick and easy to understand, it provides the information by postal code area free of charge and it does not require registration.
Swedish insurers developed VisAdapt, a tool designed to help homeowners to decrease the risk of weather-related events affecting their houses.
The Austrian association of insurers (VVO) and the Austrian government jointly developed the HORA app/website (Natural Hazard Overview and Risk Assessment Austria), which helps to determine whether there is an impending risk of flooding or other natural hazards. The website also presents up-to-date weather data on floods, including on water levels, as well as earthquakes, storms, hail, lightning and snow.
French insurers participate in the National Observatory for Natural Risks, a project involving three major partners: the Ministry of Ecological Transition, the CCR (Caisse Centrale de Réassurance) and the MRN (Mission Risques Naturels), an association created by the French insurance association (France Assureurs). This initiative aims to boost prevention and contribute to increased awareness of the risk of natural disasters by keeping citizens informed of their exposure to potential natural hazards.
The Salvage Foundation was established as an independent foundation in 1986 at the initiative of Dutch fire insurers, which are all members of the Dutch insurance association (VVN). The Salvage Foundation is unique in Europe and provides aid after fire, water, lightning, explosion or storm damage. Salvage arrives on site within an hour, undertakes damage mitigation activities, arranges shelter and provides the insurance company with the information it needs to carry out the claim settlement process without delay.
Tools and solutions for insurers
Some associations have developed tools to help insurers assess the risks and consequences of natural hazards.
In Germany, ZÜRS Geo (Zonierungssystem für Überschwemmungsrisiko und Einschätzung von Umweltrisiken) is an online zoning tool that allows insurers to calculate accurately different types of flood risk and offer risk-related premiums.
ANIA Safe, a subsidiary of Italian insurance association ANIA, created GeoSafe, a platform that uses AI-based calculations and models to help insurance companies evaluate the risks and consequences of natural hazards and disasters, such as floods, earthquakes and crop damage.
The French insurance association (France Assureurs) created a dedicated technical body, Mission Risques Naturels (MRN) and MRN GIS (General Information System), to assist private insurers in analysing their customers’ and prospective customers’ exposure to different natural hazards. MRN GIS also gives insurers access to public authorities’ hazard-zoning data, and data on land-use planning restrictions by risk level.
The French CERES tool (accessible to insurers via the CCR website) helps private insurers to benchmark their geolocalised loss records against those of the market.
In Spain, UNESPA published a report to help insurers navigate the recommendations and opinions issued by supervisors and international organisations on the procedures for insurers to integrate sustainability risks and factors into the different areas of their governance.
Forecasting and early warnings
The Dutch insurance association (VVN) publishes an annual Climate Impact Monitor (Klimaat Impact Monitor) in collaboration with Wageningen University & Research (WUR). The Climate Impact Monitor provides a compilation of extreme weather data and loss data, and other climate-related data. The VVN collaborates with the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) on issuing early warnings of extreme weather events. Combining data from the KNMI with risk and loss data from Dutch insurers allows for greater preparedness in the face of changing weather patterns, and the development of solutions to prevent damage from future extreme weather events.
UK insurers carry out a range of activities to support national and regional forecasting of future weather and catastrophe patterns. They use these outputs to inform their business practices, including pricing decisions and risk-based capital assessments. The UK insurance sector also uses such modelling in its dialogue with policymakers and has lobbied for robust action on climate change by the government.
Floods
The Czech insurance association (ČAP) and Intermap Technologies, with the support of reinsurer Swiss Re, created flood maps that are used to assess the likelihood of floods occurring in the Czech Republic. ČAP members use the system to evaluate risks and calculate property insurance premiums. It is also a useful free tool for consumers, as it helps them to determine whether their property is situated in a flood zone and it provides them with important information about insurance options, indicating for instance where there would be a possible premium increase. (Commercial and company use requires a contract with Intermap Technologies). The map data is updated regularly to ensure consistency with the information used by ČAP members.
The German insurance sector has also developed the “Naturgefahrencheck” (Natural hazards check) und “Hochwassercheck” (Flood check) online tools. With one click, every citizen can check the degree to which their home is at risk of flood, hail and storms. It is quick and easy to understand, it provides the information by postal code area free of charge and it does not require registration.
Swedish insurers developed VisAdapt, a tool designed to help homeowners to decrease the risk of weather-related events affecting their houses.
The Austrian association of insurers (VVO) and the Austrian government jointly developed the HORA app/website (Natural Hazard Overview and Risk Assessment Austria), which helps to determine whether there is an impending risk of flooding or other natural hazards. The website also presents up-to-date weather data on floods, including on water levels, as well as earthquakes, storms, hail, lightning and snow.
In Germany, ZÜRS Geo (Zonierungssystem für Überschwemmungsrisiko und Einschätzung von Umweltrisiken) is an online zoning tool that allows insurers to calculate accurately different types of flood risk and offer risk-related premiums.
What is the IAIS Holistic Framework?
The Holistic Framework, adopted in 2019 for implementation from the beginning of 2020, provides a range of macroprudential tools tailored to the insurance business model for the assessment and mitigation of systemic risk in the sector. It has three parts:
Pillar One sets out new rules on where multinational enterprises with a certain level of turnover and profitability should pay tax (“nexus” rules) and what proportion of profits should be taxed (“profit allocation” rules).
Pillar Two focuses on international businesses paying a minimum level of tax. It consists of the Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) Rules — made up of an Income Inclusion Rule that imposes top-up tax on a parent for a low-taxed constituent entity and a linked Undertaxed Payment Rule — and a Subject to Tax Rule that allows source jurisdictions to tax certain related party payments that are subject to tax below a minimum rate.
The OECD’s two-pillar solution in two paragraphs
Pillar One sets out new rules on where multinational enterprises with a certain level of turnover and profitability should pay tax (“nexus” rules) and what proportion of profits should be taxed (“profit allocation” rules).
Pillar Two focuses on international businesses paying a minimum level of tax. It consists of the Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) Rules — made up of an Income Inclusion Rule that imposes top-up tax on a parent for a low-taxed constituent entity and a linked Undertaxed Payment Rule — and a Subject to Tax Rule that allows source jurisdictions to tax certain related party payments that are subject to tax below a minimum rate.
Base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS)
Multinational enterprises that exploit gaps and mismatches between countries’ tax systems lead to domestic tax base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). The OECD estimates that BEPS practices cost countries US$100-240bn in lost revenue each year. The OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS aims to tackle tax avoidance, improve the coherence of international tax rules, ensure a more transparent tax environment and address the tax challenges from the digitalisation of the economy.
Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) rules
GloBE rules comprise three of the four rules embedded in Pillar Two of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS. The GloBE rules are a combination of an Income Inclusion Rule (IIR), an Undertaxed Payment Rule that is designed as a backstop for the IIR and a Switch-Over Rule applicable to transactions between a parent entity and an exempt parent entity under treaty provisions. The three rules aim to create an effective minimum tax rate of 15% in all jurisdictions in which a multinational enterprise operates.
Qualified domestic minimum top-up tax (QDMTT)
This is a minimum tax that is included in the domestic law of a jurisdiction and that, in a manner equivalent to the GloBE rules, increases domestic tax liability on excess profits to 15% in that jurisdiction, to the extent such excess profit is determined in a manner consistent with the computation of the GloBE income.
Subject to tax rule (STTR)
The Pillar Two initiative also comprises an STTR designed to ensure a minimum nominal rate of 9% on various transactions defined in tax treaties. This specific set of rules targets transactions accounted for in bilateral tax agreements with developing countries.
Ultimate parent entity (UPE)
The UPE is an entity that has controlling interests in other entities of a group without being controlled by any other entity.