1
/ 10
Cover
Contents
Foreword
OPINION: International regulations
Systemic risk
Corporate governance & market conduct
Anti-money laundering
Taxation
Trade
Disruptive technology
Cyber risks
Climate risks
OPINION: Disaster & Protection gap
Diversity, equity & inclusion
OPINION: Healthcare gap
About GFIA

Taxation

International tax regulation steps up to another dimension

GFIA keeps a close eye on ongoing and upcoming initiatives in the taxation field

By Suzy Zozor, chair of the GFIA Taxation Working Group


For over four years now, the GFIA Taxation Working Group has been closely monitoring the discussions within the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS). To address the tax challenges arising from the digitalisation of the economy, these discussions led to a Two-Pillar approach, introduced in October 2021, known as Pillar One and Pillar Two.


Pillars One and Two: continued complexity


If all implementation conditions are satisfied, Pillar One will enable the reallocation of excess profits made by in-scope multinational companies to market jurisdictions, beginning in 2025. GFIA has successfully advocated for the exclusion of insurance and reinsurance, classified as Regulated Financial Services, from the scope of Amount A of Pillar One.

Pillar Two introduced two sets of rules in the international tax framework to achieve a global minimum taxation of multinational enterprises:

  1. two interlocking domestic rules: the Income Inclusion Rule (IIR) and the Under-Taxed Payments Rule, which serves as a backstop to the IIR. Both sets of rules are components of the Global anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) rules, and
  2. a treaty-based rule, the Subject to Tax Rule (STTR), which allows developing countries to request the introduction of provisions in double tax treaties to achieve a minimum nominal taxation of 9% on covered payments, such as intra-group insurance and reinsurance premiums.

The latter was officially launched on 19 September 2024, when nine countries signed the STTR Multilateral Instrument in Paris. Ten additional countries also expressed interest in signing the Convention, including two EU member states.

“GFIA has successfully advocated for the exclusion of insurance and reinsurance, classified as Regulated Financial Services, from the scope of Amount A of Pillar One.”


Over fifty jurisdictions have transposed the Pillar Two GloBE rules into their domestic regulations or intend to do so. Meanwhile, discussions at the OECD level continue to refine the guidance on the applicable rules, as well as the framework for reporting requirements and dispute resolution mechanisms. In most implementing countries, the GloBE rules will be applicable to the 2024 fiscal year, with a first reporting requirement due in June 2026.

While the concept of a global minimum tax is relatively simple and straightforward, the GloBE rules are exceptionally complex. In-scope groups will have to comply with a tangle combination of Model Rules, a Commentary to the Model Rules, illustrative examples, harmonised information return, along with an ongoing process of guidance release, and the local domestic transposition of OECD rules.

Pillar Two achieved the introduction of an additional set of rules to the current financial, accounting and tax reporting processes. And on top of this, some jurisdictions are even more creative, and introduce variations or additions to the rules designed by the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS members locally. Transposing these rules to domestic tax regulation thus gives way to operational issues that need to be addressed in a harmonised way to allow for consistent compliance by companies. GFIA sent a note to the OECD Secretariat in August 2024 highlighting a selection of those issues for consideration, as member associations continuously advocate locally for simplification and clarification in the domestic transposition rules.

“The tax challenges of an increasingly digitalised and globalised economy are becoming more acute across jurisdictions.”


The UN unveils the shape of things to come


The tax challenges of an increasingly digitalised and globalised economy are becoming more acute across jurisdictions. Developing and emerging economies thus feel entitled to an improvement of their tax-to-GDP ratio. In such circumstances, the tax framework stemming out of decades of discussions, multilateral agreements and peer reviews at the OECD no longer appears comprehensive, inclusive or fair enough.

The UN Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters started the process of updating the UN Model Double Taxation Convention in light of the new challenges posed by the market. Among issues on their agenda, cross-border insurance and reinsurance appear to need reviewed rules to avoid perceived loopholes in tax resources for jurisdictions where (re)insurers collect premiums.

The Committee first considered introducing modifications to Article 5 on Permanent Establishments and Article 7 on Business Profits of the UN Model Convention to encompass cases of local insurance activities that are currently unaddressed. GFIA, alongside member associations, published a paper explaining the specifics of cross-border insurance and reinsurance and the risk of double taxation that arises from shifting the rationale for taxation from a deemed permanent establishment to the mere collection of premiums in a jurisdiction. The Committee later refined their proposal, with a draft Article 12 C providing for a withholding tax on gross premiums collected in the event of cross-border insurance and reinsurance. GFIA responded, willing to participate in the drafting of the new rules to the taxation of cross-border insurance and reinsurance.

The stakes of the discussions taking place in UN working groups on taxing insurance and reinsurance transactions may rely on how often countries will resort to UN Model Convention clauses in future double tax treaties. But the UN General Assembly gave a mandate to an Ad hoc Tax Committee to work on a renewed framework for international tax cooperation. Furthermore, the statutes of the Committee of Experts on International Cooperation in Tax Matters are said to be changing in 2025…

Something is definitely happening at the UN on tax issues, a slow shifting of powers between the OECD and the UN. Exciting times are upcoming and the GFIA Taxation Working Group stands ready to participate in all discussions relevant to the industry.

Suzy Zozor

France Assureurs

Suzy Zozor

France Assureurs

Awareness-raising campaigns

  • Insurers across Europe are involved in a broad range of awareness-raising campaigns. For instance, in Germany, risk-awareness campaigns are implemented jointly by state authorities, consumer protection organisations, the insurance industry, architects and other stakeholders. Their collaboration is built around a common goal: to raise awareness of the effects of climate change and natural hazards, of the benefits of loss prevention, and of best practices as regards natural catastrophe-resilient buildings. The high level of risk awareness in Germany is one of the reasons for the relatively low protection gap; indeed, the insurance penetration rate for natural perils such as storm or hail is more than 90%.

  • Most European insurance associations have initiatives to raise risk awareness, such as dedicated workshops, events and educational seminars, as well as frequent in-depth articles, themed newsletters, presentations and other publications.

  • Many French insurers have launched prevention campaigns and also support the campaigns of “Assurance Prévention”, an association founded by the French insurance association (France Assureurs). Assurance Prévention has produced numerous leaflets, infographics, quizzes, etc. to raise awareness of natural risks. Through its initiatives, it aims to develop a “culture of risk prevention” among students and teachers.

  • The Greek insurance association (HAIC) launched a digital awareness campaign — “Better to know than to think you know” — to provide consumers with useful information about private insurance and to set the record straight on some misperceptions. The campaign consists of six videos to educate the public about how private insurance works. Most of the videos emphasise the need for resilience in the face of natcat risks and the role of insurers in protecting private property. The videos are hosted on the interactive iknow-insurance.gr platform, which allows visitors to do a short quiz to test their knowledge of private insurance and then obtain additional information.

  • Insurance Sweden is currently working with its members on a common methodology for calculating carbon dioxide emissions during building repairs. The aim is to raise awareness of the impact on CO2 emissions of rebuilding after fire or water damage, and thus of the importance, from that perspective as well, of preventing such damages.

  • Insurance Sweden published a statistical report in October 2021 on how different municipalities and regions have been affected by damage caused by flooding, storm and fire.

  • Spotlighting the central role of municipalities in climate-change adaptation, Insurance Sweden ranks Swedish municipalities according to their adaptation work. The methodology is based on the European Commission’s Adaption Support Tool (2013). The ranking is released every other year, the June 2021 version is available here.

  • UNESPA, the Spanish insurance association, launched a dedicated website in October 2021 — “Naturalmente Protegidos” (Naturally protected) to explain how natcat insurance works in Spain. It focuses on 10 different risks (rain, flood, wind, drought, frost, hail, snow, earthquake, volcanic eruption and lightning) and details for each how insurance covers property, life, harvests and livestock. The website illustrates the success of the Spanish public-private natcat insurance model. It was jointly developed by private insurers (UNESPA), the Consorcio de Compensación de Seguros (CCS) government scheme and Agroseguro, Spain’s agricultural insurance system, and was launched within the framework of Estamos Seguros, UNESPA’s financial education campaign (running since 2016).

  • In collaboration with CEPYME, the Spanish confederation of SMEs, UNESPA launched in October 2020 “Prevenir para crecer” (Prevent to grow), a website with information on insurance for SMEs. The website highlights potential risks to which SMEs are exposed, including natcat-related risks, and provides advice on how to prevent them.

  • Insurance Ireland, the Irish insurance association, and a number of Irish insurers have launched consumer blogs and information repositories on their websites to share useful information with consumers about responsible and ESG investing.

Education

The European insurance industry works to increase financial literacy in relation to risk awareness, insurance protection and long-term savings:

  • The Croatian Insurance Bureau (HUO) launched a first educational project in 2009, “Financial literacy in the Republic of Croatia”, which was followed by a range of educational activities, often implemented jointly with independent insurers. One of these activities, “Safer Tomorrow”, was initiated in 2021, and aims to raise citizens’ awareness of the benefits of insurance. Within the framework of the project, HUO launched several videos and infographics, some of which specifically target young people.

  • The HUO organises a yearly competition for the best scientific paper, the best graduate thesis and the best undergraduate thesis in the field of insurance. HUO also publishes the “Croatian magazine for INSURANCE”, a scientific journal for professionals to advance good practice in the sector. Finally, some insurers in Croatia created a colouring book for children to promote financial literacy at a young age in a fun and simple way.

  • In Italy, the ANIA Academy, together with CeTIF (Research Centre on Technologies, Innovation and Finance of the Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore), launched the second edition (2022) of the 2nd level master’s in insurance management to train professionals and enable them to respond to the challenges of the “new normal”.


  • ANIA is also collaborating with LUISS Business School to develop a major course in insurance management as part of its Executive Master in Financial Management.

  • Insurance Europe produces information for consumers as part of its “InsureWisely” financial education initiative. This includes one-pagers on different insurance topics, including how to limit the effects of natural catastrophes.


  • The French insurance association (France Assureurs) developed a series of educational booklets within the framework of EDUCFI (the French national strategy for economic, budgetary, and financial education), an initiative launched by the French Central Bank. These booklets help users to better understand how insurance works and what insurance products do and do not cover.

  • The Spanish insurance association (UNESPA) set up a financial education programme for schools, “El Riesgo y Yo” (“The Risk and I”). It involves 40 insurance undertakings and 164 volunteers and aims to give 2 500 teenage school students basic financial knowledge and insights into risk management.

Tools and solutions for consumers

Several insurers have developed tools or applications to inform consumers of extreme weather events and whether their properties are at risk from such events.

  • In 2021, the German insurance association (GDV) introduced a new system for making the risk to buildings of heavy rain damage more transparent. Buildings are placed into one of three risk categories, depending on their location.

  • The German insurance sector has also developed the “Naturgefahrencheck” (Natural hazards check) and “Hochwassercheck” (Flood check) online tools. With one click, every citizen can check the degree to which their home is at risk of flood, hail and storms. It is quick and easy to understand, it provides the information by postal code area free of charge and it does not require registration.

  • Swedish insurers developed VisAdapt, a tool designed to help homeowners to decrease the risk of weather-related events affecting their houses.

  • The Austrian association of insurers (VVO) and the Austrian government jointly developed the HORA app/website (Natural Hazard Overview and Risk Assessment Austria), which helps to determine whether there is an impending risk of flooding or other natural hazards. The website also presents up-to-date weather data on floods, including on water levels, as well as earthquakes, storms, hail, lightning and snow.

  • French insurers participate in the National Observatory for Natural Risks, a project involving three major partners: the Ministry of Ecological Transition, the CCR (Caisse Centrale de Réassurance) and the MRN (Mission Risques Naturels), an association created by the French insurance association (France Assureurs). This initiative aims to boost prevention and contribute to increased awareness of the risk of natural disasters by keeping citizens informed of their exposure to potential natural hazards.

  • The Salvage Foundation was established as an independent foundation in 1986 at the initiative of Dutch fire insurers, which are all members of the Dutch insurance association (VVN). The Salvage Foundation is unique in Europe and provides aid after fire, water, lightning, explosion or storm damage. Salvage arrives on site within an hour, undertakes damage mitigation activities, arranges shelter and provides the insurance company with the information it needs to carry out the claim settlement process without delay.

Tools and solutions for insurers

Some associations have developed tools to help insurers assess the risks and consequences of natural hazards.

  • In Germany, ZÜRS Geo (Zonierungssystem für Überschwemmungsrisiko und Einschätzung von Umweltrisiken) is an online zoning tool that allows insurers to calculate accurately different types of flood risk and offer risk-related premiums.

  • ANIA Safe, a subsidiary of Italian insurance association ANIA, created GeoSafe, a platform that uses AI-based calculations and models to help insurance companies evaluate the risks and consequences of natural hazards and disasters, such as floods, earthquakes and crop damage.

  • The French insurance association (France Assureurs) created a dedicated technical body, Mission Risques Naturels (MRN) and MRN GIS (General Information System), to assist private insurers in analysing their customers’ and prospective customers’ exposure to different natural hazards. MRN GIS also gives insurers access to public authorities’ hazard-zoning data, and data on land-use planning restrictions by risk level.

  • The French CERES tool (accessible to insurers via the CCR website) helps private insurers to benchmark their geolocalised loss records against those of the market.

  • In Spain, UNESPA published a report to help insurers navigate the recommendations and opinions issued by supervisors and international organisations on the procedures for insurers to integrate sustainability risks and factors into the different areas of their governance.

Forecasting and early warnings

  • The Dutch insurance association (VVN) publishes an annual Climate Impact Monitor (Klimaat Impact Monitor) in collaboration with Wageningen University & Research (WUR). The Climate Impact Monitor provides a compilation of extreme weather data and loss data, and other climate-related data. The VVN collaborates with the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute (KNMI) on issuing early warnings of extreme weather events. Combining data from the KNMI with risk and loss data from Dutch insurers allows for greater preparedness in the face of changing weather patterns, and the development of solutions to prevent damage from future extreme weather events.

  • UK insurers carry out a range of activities to support national and regional forecasting of future weather and catastrophe patterns. They use these outputs to inform their business practices, including pricing decisions and risk-based capital assessments. The UK insurance sector also uses such modelling in its dialogue with policymakers and has lobbied for robust action on climate change by the government.

  • French insurers are experimenting with a smartphone/SMS system to provide consumers with early warnings of extreme weather events.

Floods

  • The Czech insurance association (ČAP) and Intermap Technologies, with the support of reinsurer Swiss Re, created flood maps that are used to assess the likelihood of floods occurring in the Czech Republic. ČAP members use the system to evaluate risks and calculate property insurance premiums. It is also a useful free tool for consumers, as it helps them to determine whether their property is situated in a flood zone and it provides them with important information about insurance options, indicating for instance where there would be a possible premium increase. (Commercial and company use requires a contract with Intermap Technologies). The map data is updated regularly to ensure consistency with the information used by ČAP members.

  • The German insurance sector has also developed the “Naturgefahrencheck” (Natural hazards check) und “Hochwassercheck” (Flood check) online tools. With one click, every citizen can check the degree to which their home is at risk of flood, hail and storms. It is quick and easy to understand, it provides the information by postal code area free of charge and it does not require registration.

  • Swedish insurers developed VisAdapt, a tool designed to help homeowners to decrease the risk of weather-related events affecting their houses.

  • The Austrian association of insurers (VVO) and the Austrian government jointly developed the HORA app/website (Natural Hazard Overview and Risk Assessment Austria), which helps to determine whether there is an impending risk of flooding or other natural hazards. The website also presents up-to-date weather data on floods, including on water levels, as well as earthquakes, storms, hail, lightning and snow.


  • In Germany, ZÜRS Geo (Zonierungssystem für Überschwemmungsrisiko und Einschätzung von Umweltrisiken) is an online zoning tool that allows insurers to calculate accurately different types of flood risk and offer risk-related premiums.


  • ANIA Safe, a subsidiary of Italian insurance association ANIA, created GeoSafe, a platform that uses AI-based calculations and models to help insurance companies evaluate the risks and consequences of natural hazards and disasters, such as floods, earthquakes and crop damage.

What is the IAIS Holistic Framework?

The Holistic Framework, adopted in 2019 for implementation from the beginning of 2020, provides a range of macroprudential tools tailored to the insurance business model for the assessment and mitigation of systemic risk in the sector. It has three parts:

  • Supervisory material: policy measures to increase resilience to vulnerabilities and exposures to systemic risk
  • Global Monitoring Exercise:
    • Monitoring of individual insurers
    • Sector-wide monitoring
  • Implementation assessment


The OECD’s two-pillar solution in two paragraphs


Pillar One
sets out new rules on where multinational enterprises with a certain level of turnover and profitability should pay tax (“nexus” rules) and what proportion of profits should be taxed (“profit allocation” rules).


Pillar Two focuses on international businesses paying a minimum level of tax. It consists of the Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) Rules — made up of an Income Inclusion Rule that imposes top-up tax on a parent for a low-taxed constituent entity and a linked Undertaxed Payment Rule — and a Subject to Tax Rule that allows source jurisdictions to tax certain related party payments that are subject to tax below a minimum rate.

The OECD’s two-pillar solution in two paragraphs

Pillar One sets out new rules on where multinational enterprises with a certain level of turnover and profitability should pay tax (“nexus” rules) and what proportion of profits should be taxed (“profit allocation” rules).

Pillar Two focuses on international businesses paying a minimum level of tax. It consists of the Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) Rules — made up of an Income Inclusion Rule that imposes top-up tax on a parent for a low-taxed constituent entity and a linked Undertaxed Payment Rule — and a Subject to Tax Rule that allows source jurisdictions to tax certain related party payments that are subject to tax below a minimum rate.

Base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS)

Multinational enterprises that exploit gaps and mismatches between countries’ tax systems lead to domestic tax base erosion and profit shifting (BEPS). The OECD estimates that BEPS practices cost countries US$100-240bn in lost revenue each year. The OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS aims to tackle tax avoidance, improve the coherence of international tax rules, ensure a more transparent tax environment and address the tax challenges from the digitalisation of the economy.

Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) rules

GloBE rules comprise three of the four rules embedded in Pillar Two of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS. The GloBE rules are a combination of an Income Inclusion Rule (IIR), an Undertaxed Payment Rule that is designed as a backstop for the IIR and a Switch-Over Rule applicable to transactions between a parent entity and an exempt parent entity under treaty provisions. The three rules aim to create an effective minimum tax rate of 15% in all jurisdictions in which a multinational enterprise operates.

Qualified domestic minimum top-up tax (QDMTT)

This is a minimum tax that is included in the domestic law of a jurisdiction and that, in a manner equivalent to the GloBE rules, increases domestic tax liability on excess profits to 15% in that jurisdiction, to the extent such excess profit is determined in a manner consistent with the computation of the GloBE income.

Subject to tax rule (STTR)

The Pillar Two initiative also comprises an STTR designed to ensure a minimum nominal rate of 9% on various transactions defined in tax treaties. This specific set of rules targets transactions accounted for in bilateral tax agreements with developing countries.

Ultimate parent entity (UPE)

The UPE is an entity that has controlling interests in other entities of a group without being controlled by any other entity.

Base Erosion and Profit Shifting (BEPS)

The OECD defines domestic base erosion and profit shifting as the panel of tax planning strategies multinational companies may resort to, to exploit loopholes in international tax rules and shift profit to low or no tax locations, thus reducing to the minimum their tax liabilities.

Global Anti-Base Erosion (GloBE) Rules

GloBE Rules comprise three of the four rules embedded in Pillar Two of the OECD/G20 Inclusive Framework on BEPS initiative to address the digitalisation of the economy and ensure a minimum level of taxation for multinational enterprises. The GloBE Rules are a combination of an Income Inclusion Rule (IIR), an Undertaxed Payment rule that is designed as a backstop for the IIR and a Switch-Over Rule applicable to transactions between a parent entity and an exempt parent entity under treaty provisions. The three rules aim to create an effective minimum tax rate of 15% in all jurisdictions in which a multinational enterprise operates.

Qualified domestic top-up tax (QDMTT)

This is a minimum tax that is included in the domestic law of a jurisdiction and that, in a manner equivalent to the GloBE Rules, increases domestic tax liability on excess profits to 15% in that jurisdiction, to the extent such excess profit is determined in a manner consistent with the computation of the GloBE income.

Subject to tax rule (STTR)

The Pillar Two initiative also comprises an STTR designed to ensure a minimum nominal rate of 9% on various transactions defined in tax treaties. This specific set of rules targets transactions accounted for in bilateral tax agreements with developing countries.